huddy Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Cross posting this from the Nikon board thread on this tool.
My older GTX 1070 (ITX sized) crunches through Z6 (24mp) files in 40-45s with 20-28% utilization while the CPU (Ryzen 5800) sits around 1-5% in the background, and RAM utilization is 10-12GB. Of course newer RTX or AMD cards are faster but I bought this while avoiding the crypto rushes and the price was decent (around $215 at the time) and it's still a great heavy lifter for export times.
So far I think the Adobe tool is semi decent but also GIGO. Well exposed images taken with higher ISO see some improvement (although not very visible at 8x10 display size on my monitor).
Images like the below, I'm seeing it smear/make up textures that don't exist and existing noise reduction tools are greatly preferred. I've seen it do different texture takes for both running prior to and after adjustments.
The lower image is a crop from the lower 1/4 - 1/3 of the image. This was shot very underexposed for foreground to correctly expose the sky, Venus, and the light of the building. Knowing I could push the foreground with a modern sensor, my final image (not displayed due to family inclusion) is exposure +0.09 but shadows pushed +74 with a very modest bump in luminance and color noise reduction. That image isn't perfect, but it's exactly what I was looking for.
AKH_1717 by Alan Hudson, on Flickr
AKH_1717-Enhanced-NR-2 by Alan Hudson, on Flickr
|