freaklikeme Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
I'm not a fan of fixed lens cameras, but 35 is my favorite focal length, so I had to give both the RX1rII and the X100v a try. My thoughts...
If absolute IQ were the goal, I'd do what I had to do to make it work with the Sony. Like Jim indicates, the output can be sublime, but I would be miserable using it because there's nothing about the camera in use that makes me happy. Awkwardly small and still indiscreet, awkward EVF implementation, terrible MF experience, slow overall operation.
The Fuji has equally terrible MF, thanks to the awkwardness of the smaller lens protrusion, but, otherwise, my enjoyment in using the camera was much greater than with the Sony. The grip and thumb rest aren't substantial, but they're just enough to keep it comfortable in my big hands without any additions. The control layout, while minimal, still gives you options on how you want to use the camera. It's faster in operation, AF is stickier and snappier, and the lens is excellent. And I can't say enough good things about the hybrid viewfinder. I don't miss an OVF for the most part, but having good options for both EVF or OVF in the same camera felt luxurious. Overall, I found it a pleasing little camera to use.
The APS-C X-Trans sensor is never going to be the equal of Sony's mighty 42MP FF, no matter how good the lens. Personally, I'd accept results that fall a bit short of sublime to get a camera I enjoy using, so, if forced to pick between the two, I'd choose Fuji.
|