AmbientMike Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #4 · p.2 #4 · Best Lenses for European Street Scenes & Countrysides? | |
billsamuels wrote:
I'm leaving in a few weeks for Europe and we're going to Prague, Paris, and ending in London. In Prague, I'm interested in the street scenes as it's pretty old world. There's also a lot of art so I may need a fast lens that can handle the lack of a flash. Then we take a train to Paris, so I'm not sure what I would use on a train and how fast the trains there go between Prague and Paris, but we have to change trains 3 times. Once we arrive in Paris, again street scenes, buildings, etc. Then we rent a car to go to a castle in the French countryside, and I love countrysides.
Then we take a plane to Glasgow and head to the Lakes NP for more scenery.
Last time I went to Europe, I took my Canon EF 24-105mm F/4 IS and the EF 70-200mm, which is actually the lens I used the most. The only problem with the 70-200 is that while it's very light weight for its size, it's an F/4 so sometimes it's very difficult to get a photo and other times, the photos can be blurred. I'm wondering if it's time to look at getting the same lens with either the F/2.8 OR should I get the version with the IS? Which is better?
Also, I was thinking about getting a real sharp inbetween lens, something like a Sigma Art 30, 35, or 40mm lens for walking around with. I have a Zeiss 25mm classic lens for Canon, but I hear that the Sigma are just as sharp?
Anyone care to comment on the new Zeiss lenses versus the new Sigma lenses; this for a Canon 5DS-R.
Thanks.
Bill...Show more →
IS should get you more than a stop, so 70-200/4 should be better than 2.8 not having IS. Vacation photos usually more static even if not f/4 is pretty good. 70-200/2.8 IS II should be excellent but heavy. 70-200/4 IS V1 used to be known as the sharpest Canon tele zoom, even though they had 3 iterations of 2.8 by that time. So it should be really good, even today.
For art museums, I've usually used 50/1.8 or 18-55 at 50mm ff equivalent or more. Even on ff you can get big bierstadts on 50mm. I doubt my photos were perfect to the corners, but looked pretty good. Worthwhile imo. Not much crowding in the ones I've been to, more the opposite problem. Especially traveling I'd think you'd often go midday, mid week, so I doubt you'd have too much trouble.
I'm more 3 zooms, myself, though I've taken superteles and used macro lenses on USA trips, flying and car. 40 art is 2.6 lbs. If you have 16-35 you could add 50/1.8 & be good to 70mm. 24-105 certainly covers a lot, especially + 70-200. I'd rather have uwa too, though. If you use 70-200 a lot, definitely take 70-200.
|