JadedWriter Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #8 · p.1 #8 · As long as Nikon keeps repair parts in stock | |
Somebody actually legit needs to do a poll of who is still actively using AF-D lenses, when they were bought them and the actual age range of said person using them. Canon has already eradicated a mount before moving to EF mount and current RF mount. I honestly do not think Nikon is dumb enough to make a new mirrorless camera (no stuff like the Z30 don't count) without putting Xspeed 7 into it. My Z6II adapted my 105 1.4 and 70-200FL pretty well. My Z mount transition was smoother than E mount, I just didn't adapt that much glass to it unless said glass was actually good and still went native where I could. My biggest Z mount issue was my Godox flashes not working and having to go to Adorama and having them (flash and trigger) updated by them. I honestly think Z mount transition issues depending on when you got into the system (and what you shoot) is vastly blown out of proportion. My literal tone with AF-D lenses is "Ok, they don't work great on Z mount, I guess I'm not buying them."
ilkka_nissila wrote:
On the contrary, Nikon made their reputation by maintaining compatibility to older lenses for a long time and they advertised some of the AF lenses (the DC Nikkors) until only a few years ago. They didn't make any 135mm or 180mm prime, or the 200 Micro in AF-S. When you form a customer base by keeping compatibility for the longest time, these people learn to take advantage of the different characters of the lenses developed in different eras and enjoy them. By then shafting the customers by dropping compatibility for no good reason (the D780 shows that LV AF can work well with AF Nikkors without in-lens motors), the customers will feel betrayed and move to another brand. Despite Canon taking its sweet time before introducing full-frame mirrorless, Canon managed the transition without losing market share whereas Nikon lost 70% of its market share. The simple reason is that Canon was able to maintain good compatibility and Nikon did not. The Z9 is reported to AF AF-S Nikkors well but the other camera bodies jitter quite a bit when autofocusing many AF-S Nikkors especially in low light.
By providing a smoother transition, Canon was able to keep their old customers and increase their market share to a record high, despite being just as late to the game as Nikon. They just respected their existing equipment base more and this grows customer loyalty.
I have hope that the replacements to the Z6 II and Z7 II will have competitive AF in their price classes by inheriting Expeed 7 from the Z9. It should also support adapted lenses fairly well. I hope. The Z9 shows that it is possible. They just have to want to do it.
You cannot play the game of luring customers with long-standing compatibility and then suddenly make a mess of it. Trust is in the manufacturer is key for customers to have enough faith in the longevity of the company's support to justify buying expensive lenses. A consistent policy is essential to get loyal, lifelong customers who mix earlier with new lenses and enjoy the variety. These are the best customers of all.
...Show more →
|