princeharbinger Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
"The only drawback is that my copy has quite a strong field curvature at 35mm, this is most noticeable on my A7RV, less so on the A7RIII."
Try it on at least two different A7RV bodies. It might be that your A7RV has a misaligned sensor.
HelBen85 wrote:
The Tamron 35-150 is a fantastic lens.
I'm usually very critical, but this lens totally convinces me.
My copy is super sharp over the entire focal length range, from open aperture. Given this performance, the Tamron is ridiculously light and small.
Sharpness:
At 35mm it is as sharp stopped down as my Voigtlander 35mm APO (except the extreme corners on full frame).
At 50mm it is sharper when stopped down than all Voigtlander 50mm APO copies I have tested so far (except the extreme corners on full frame).
At 135mm it is almost as sharp as the 135mm GM.
In fact, I now prefer the Tamron to all other lenses in terms of sharpness.
Even within the tele range, the Tamron produces consistently sharp images when shooting landscapes, something very few lenses can reliably do. All the 70-180mm copies I tested could not do that.
Sunstars:
At f/11 I get beautiful sunstars.
I also find the backlight behaviour to be above average.
Bokeh:
I find it very good for a zoom and in many situations I like it (subjectively) even better than, for example, my Voigtlander 35mm APO.
Colours and image impression:
I find the Tamron can create very three-dimensional images. The pictures look like they were made with a high-quality primes.
The Tamron draws the most beautiful colours I have ever seen from a zoom. In this respect, however, it can't keep up with my expensive primes.
The only drawback is that my copy has quite a strong field curvature at 35mm, this is most noticeable on my A7RV, less so on the A7RIII.
In fact, the 35-150mm is the first Tamron lens in my life as a photographer (in the last 15 years) that I really like, even after several months of use.
...Show more →
|