highdesertmesa Online Upload & Sell: On
|
p.4 #6 · p.4 #6 · Leica M10-R Black Chrome is now discontinued | |
flash wrote:
Actually I think they need to make a smaller camera in ADDITION to the SL-3. There's a place for bigger cameras in a line up and they're MUCH better for larger lenses of which L mount has many. Fuji have th XH2 and XT5. Canon have the R3 and R5. Nikon make a Z9 alongside the Z7II. Leica could go the XT/XPro approach, wher they have the Hybrid SL-3 and a photography focused smaller RF style body. The problem isn't the SL2. It's that it's your only option. Has the SL2-S been S5 sized I think reactions would be different.
I think we have three main wish lists/options here.
1. A Q series, with the same basic camera but with more focal lengths. A Q328, Q350 and Q390 for example.
2. An EVF based camera that takes M lenses. (The Leica *E* I proposed some time ago). Could have all the bells an whistles like IBIS as well because it's not going to offent the purists. Native M mount but probably Q shaped and slightly larger than an M10 to accomodate the IBIS unit.
3. A smaller L mount body. RF styled. Photography focused or maybe even photography only. The size would have some heat management implications. Takes M lenses via an adaptor.
Some poor boffin at Leica would have to decide which is Gold and which is Lead......
Gordon...Show more →
I agree. I didn't mean the SL3 needed to be A7-small, but probably R5-sized; that is, smaller than the SL2 but still big enough to use with large lenses.
Good list. I think the EVF-M will be the M12, with or without IBIS. If anything, they will have dual offerings of traditional M and EVF-M. Most profitable would of course be a Q3 in multiple focal lengths. Many of us would buy a "kit" of multiple Q bodies 28/50/90 and use that as an alternative to everything else we own. I think that would be additive profit and not take away from the M or SL.
|