gdanmitchell Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
One of my mani subjects wiht my Fujifilm (XPro2) is handheld night street photography. As you can imagine, the combination of using higher ISO plus the presence of big contrasts between shaded areas and light sources that appear in the scene can be a challenge.
I also use a high MP Canon FF system for my tripod-based night photography, and have done some street photography with earlier versions of the came lineage of Canon FF cameras.
In my view, the Fujifilm system performs very well in this kind of photography. I can usually recover quite a bit of shadow detail in post, and applying post-processing noise reduction gets that issue under control as you would expect.
In other words, I actually choose to use the Fujifilm x-trans system for a good portion of my night photography, even though I have another system that most would consider to be technically better.
(I do a lot of landscape photography with the bigger system, but do not do much of that at all with the Fujifilm, so I can only infer how that would work.)
I believe that people often misconstrue a few things about DR and how it affects photography. I think two errors are common:
1. Folks often speak as if there is a binary of possible DR situations — either you don't have enough or you do — and that you want to get the camera that has enough.
2. People seem to think that if, say, a camera has 11.5 stops of DR that it will be great with a 11-stop subject and fail with a 12-stop subject. In reality, the difference between the two is not either/or, but one of degree... and both can produce good results.
Something else people forget. There are really three places you might find yourself in regards to DR if you are are comparing cameras.
1. You are photographing a scene with a dynamic range that virtually any camera can handle well. This is by far the most common situation.
2. You are photographing a scene with a dynamic range that NO camera can handle well. (Think of a shot that includes the setting sun and some details in the shadows.) This is probably the second-most-common situation and it will require alternative techniques no matter what camera you use: exposure blending, some heavy post-processing, GND filters, etc.
3. You are photographing a scene where the DR is too wide for one camera but within the slightly larger DR of another. That's a pretty small target and, hence, the least likely scenario. Keep in mind that in that non-overlapping range the weaker camera will just be a little bit worse and the better camera won't be perfect.
So, what I'm getting at here is that with very rare exceptions the DR issue, while not entirely unimportant, really needs to be weighed against a range of other factors that you consider when selecting a camera.
|