cocodrillo Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
TooManyShots wrote:
Unless you are shooting with a 500mm or 600mm, or the 400mm f2.8, I don't see any reasons why you would need to use a monopod. Oh, this hasn't been discussed enough but if your "clients" seeing you hustling and "working" on the field, they have more respect for you than you sitting on a stool with a monopod holding a 70-200....
Depends what you're doing, but I can tell you from experience that holding up a 70-200 f2.8 for an hour straight to shoot the finish line of a triathlon is needless discomfort. Same goes for shooting large cross country races with a 300 f2.8. The shoulder fatigue gets in the way of shooting good images if you are tasked with hitting the whole race.
On the original question, I've got to admit that having the monopod over my shoulder has never bothered me, but then I also used to squat a lot of weight. The stick I'm using now is a Manfrotto aluminum one that has a bit of padding built into the top of it. Frankly, I'm happier to have that on cold, icy days to keep my hands/gloves away from the metal than as a consideration for shoulder protection. No judgements here... it just goes with what you are used to. What I don't like these days is how the foot on my 600 sticks off the end of the monopod and into my clavicle. I need to modify my carrying technique.
|