Ripolini Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #3 · p.2 #3 · lightweight walk around zoom for Z6: Sony 28-60 + ETZ21 or Z 24-50? | |
BPsmith511 wrote:
I'm saying you already have the 24-70 F4, a lens that is in all regards except size superior to the options you're considering. Better optics, better range, better aperture, for not much more size weight.
I understand perfectly your point. However, I do not agree with your statement "for not much more size weight".
I guess manufacturers too do not agree with you
Why Nikon should offer two "kit zooms" (24-70/4 S & 24-50/4-6.3) Just to allow people to save money?
Let's see figures:
Z5 w/24-50/4-6.3 price is 1739 €;
z5 w/24-70/4 price is 2079 €, i.e. about 20% more.
I'm not sure people do opt for the cheaper alternative to save 20%.
With a similar reasoning, why does Sony offer the compact and lightweight A7C vs A7 III (both 24 Mpix)? The latter costs 20% more. People opting for the A7C love its size and weight, despite of the poorer ergonomics.
|