GroovyGeek Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #19 · p.1 #19 · Which software allow me to change the boring blue sky? | |
RoamingScott wrote:
Auto subject detection is so good that the magic wand will be getting depreciated soon!
That will be great if it was robust. In this case auto subject detection misses even something as obvious as the sky between the legs (you can see that in some of the edits posted in this thread, probably because they were done quickly for the sake of snark) and the relatively large opening on the upper portion of the wing. If you look closer around the edges of the bird, particularly in the leg area, you can also see a number of questionable choices that the magic wand deals with much better at least for this particular image, e.g. the heavy "staircasing" of the selection along diagonal straight lines, for example the tail above the feet. And let's not even mention the space between the toes on the feet, or the specs on the wings, particularly immediately below the body. Try to put a flaming orange sunset behind the bird and these will stand out like a sore thumb.
When it comes to post processing I rarely trust automated tools. Yes, they are getting better, for example content aware fill, but stuff like focus stacking, exposure blending, sky replacement, etc, are still much better done by hand, at least if you want them done right. Perhaps some day in the future, when subject selection becomes sentient... 
|