Dave Sanders Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
guyharrison wrote:
For optical performance and rendering I would give the edge to the Batis. Really, it is everything you could want in terms of sharpness, contrast and microcontrast, and color rendering. But, I have a particular liking for Zeiss rendering and my prime set is all 5 of the Batis lenses.
Having rented one, I will say the 24 1.4 GM is not far behind but has a different "look", and also gives the extra speed (and some extra weight). Really, I would base my choice on whether you simply must have the extra stop of speed. If you can live with f 2, then shop around for a used Batis (I got a "like new" one on the forum here for $750--no brainer!).
My use case is landscape, astro landscape, travel/architecture. So, optical quality across the frame and at smaller f-stops is important for me, and bokeh and background blur much less important. So, consider my comments from that point of view. BTW, the Batis is excellent wide open and a great astro landscape lens....Show more →
I had the 24GM, Batis 25 and still have the Loxia 25. The Loxia is the best if landscapes are your game; sharper, better contrast. The best 24/25 in existence, IMO.
My experience with the GM and the Batis is different from yours; my testing echoes all of the reviews online: the GM is sharper, even wide open, has lower CA and much better bokeh.
To quote the review on Phillip Reeve:
When I first used the GM I would not have known it was a little larger and heavier than the Batis if I hadn’t looked at the specs. This is remarkable, a full stop faster and yet a very similar form factor. The GM is as sharp wide open as the Batis is stopped down a little; so the GM at f1.4 is sharper than Batis at f2. And the bokeh of the GM is much nicer both wide open and f2 than the Batis, and perhaps a touch better at other apertures.
I have seen online complaints about flare and CA on the GM: but again both are considerably better, in my experience than the Batis!
|