sjms Online Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #8 · p.1 #8 · Why no 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 Z on the roadmap? | |
GroovyGeek wrote:
The 100-400 is too large, too heavy, and too expensive to fill that gap. The 70-300 is literally half the size,and less than half the weight (w/o FTZ) and price relative to the 100-400.
I can understand them deprioritizing it for whatever reason, but not its complete absence from the roadmap.
thats an opinion. the 100-400 is roughly the size of the 70-200 i carry. possibly low on the priority list as you said.
|