POTOMAN Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #8 · p.2 #8 · Canon ES-71 vs ES-71 II Lens Hoods: What's the Difference? | |
Gochugogi wrote:
I've bought many JJC hood over the years: 85% of Canon quality at 25% of Canon's price. I usually need to use fine sandpaper (1000 grit+) to smooth the hood's mount surface for an easy fit. Otherwise they tend to go on hard and gritty.
Good to know the specifics, that is useful info. Had you not posted I would have held JJC hood fitment quality in higher regard.
---------------------------------------------
rscheffler wrote:
The hoods of some of the newer Canon lenses - it might actually now be all, but my newest lens is the 85/1.4L IS - that attach with a bayonet mount, have a button/tab you depress to then rotate and remove the hood. The 50/1.4 is not one of these lenses. Until recently Canon's bayonet mounted hoods were all held in place by friction and were generally quite tight. But I guess some had problems with them, or it's a case of a designer deciding to 'improve' a product. So now those with the lock tab mount very easily with a relatively loose fit. The problem is if the lock tab breaks or is bumped, or whatever, then the hood can rotate off very easily and be lost. So far I haven't had this happen, but a friend has. Perhaps the worst hood design was some of the early EF lenses that had clip on hoods, such as the 85/1.2, which weren't exactly the most secure fit....Show more →
I do not believe I have seen this newer style mount. I think the only canon lenses I have handled with hoods are the 24/1.4LII, 50/1.8 II, and the 85/1.2LII. I believe my 50/1.8II did have the older clip on style that you're describing. I actually used to "bump" the crap out of that one while it swung from my shoulder at busy events, never had an issue with it coming off! My plastic fantastic did however eventually snap in half. That was indeed a sad day for my first love... Learned my lesson that day as to why you sometimes need to carry spare gear.
---------------------------------------------
garyvot wrote:
Late to this thread, but can confirm the mark II hood is flocked.
The main thing I wanted to add is that use of either of these hoods (or a compatible third party knock off) is highly recommended with this lens in particular to protect the exposed front focusing group from mechanical damage.
Tell me how I know... 
---------------------------------------------
artsupreme wrote:
The two I linked on the previous page were less than $8 and work fine. Meanwhile the OP is spending all sorts of time searching for something that can be delivered next day for $7.49
This thread is about identifying the difference(s) between the genuine Canon ES-71 and ES-71 II lens hoods. We've inevitably naturally nerded off into various related Canon EF lens hood discussions. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
|