flash Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.3 #1 · p.3 #1 · The Best Digital Leica For Many Normal People Is A Fuji | |
Desmolicious wrote:
It's not just the 'it's bigger than 35mm so it's medium format' argument.
It’s not just an argument. That’s the actual definition. It’s the middle sized film stocks. At what point does a knife become a machette?
It's the rendering differences that real medium format i.e 6x4.5 and bigger brings to an image. Shoot a portrait with a GFX, ands shoot the same one with a 35mm FF hi rez digicam. The biggest differences are maleability in the file, and extreme sharpness. It is actually hard pressed to see a difference as the physical size of the sensor is only a little bigger.
Now take that portrait with a 6x4.5, 6x6, 6x7 etc camera. The difference in rendering is striking, even if you acknowledge that the digicam's output is sharper etc. It's not about that. It's about the look of the image. And the only thing I see with the current faux medium format is 'less noise! more sharpness! greater DR!" Which is fine if that is what you are going for.
I'm not. I'm going for an image that looks like it was shot on film medium format from a rendering perspective.
...Show more →
I’m not arguing that it looks like 645. Heck, I call it miniMF for a reason as well.
As far as there being a difference, there is. It’s about the same difference as APSC to 135 format and we all know how the zealots like to go on about how different they look. Sure, it’s subtle and really at screen size you’d be hard pressed to see a difference but when you print at the sizes I do it’s there. If you shoot the HB 80mm or the GFX110 and print big, it’s definitely there. Sometimes subtle is important to the photographer.
It’s absolutely true that we used to shoot MF because lenses weren’t as good and bigger film meant more detail. And that’s not really the case any more. Even m43 has gobs of detail. We’re looking a subtleties now. Any one who collects 50mm lenses will get that.
But that’s not the only reason for shooting miniMF (happy with that?). Even the 7 year old X1D/645Z/GFX50 sensor has noticably more robust files than any current 135 format sensor. More DR. Less noise. If you push files hard the bigger sensor makes a lot of sense. You can do 1 hour exposures on it with no LENR with no issues.
It’s also a different ratio. So there’s that.
I do wish my M11 or SL2 looked exactly like my GFX, X1D or 645Z (I have them all). But they don’t. The bigger sensor files are deeper, cleaner and richer. They just are.
Gordon
ps: also I don’t get why we can’t discuss this. I have no issues with your point of view. I don’t think we’re being aggressive here. I’d have the same debate in person over a coffee or a beer. *let’s get back to photography*?? How much more photography can a debate get? 
|