vertigo1959 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Paul_100A wrote:
i don't know what you are shooting so...
for perched birds...
I still have the 4/300 (and the 150-400) and I had the 100-400 for a period of time. I use the OM-1 now but I started birding with the EM1mkII (for a couple years) and then the EM1X (for nearly 3 years)....all with the 4/300 (and both TCs).
sure, the 100-400 is capable of producing good sharp results very comparable to the 4/300 BUT not very often.
with the 100-400; in a day i might have gotten maybe 3 critically focused images (showing image quality comparable to the 4/300) out of a 1000 whereas with the 4/300 i'd get an over abundance of critically focused images. i can even say that I get a higher number of critically focused images per burst with the 4/300 than I do with the 150-400 Pro.
*I remember thinking to myself that the 100-400 seemed to focus faster than the 4/300...I have no idea if that's indeed anymore than an impression.
for BIF...I wouldn't bother at all with the 100-400. some folks will likely disagree with that opinion but some folks also have different requirements of, and satisfactory levels of, image quality....Show more →
Thanks very much , i shoot mostly small and medium size birds ,think i will just stick with my 300mm and 1.4 TC.
|