RustyBug Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
jcolwell wrote:
Thanks for posting the link. Some valuable information, there.
OTOH, one of the first 'useful comments' that I read is simply a personal opinion, and one that I think is wrong. That is: "Do not modify your lenses! Your camera will be obsolete in two years - a lens will still be around in two generations!..." That's just plain nonsense. In some cases, it makes sense, and other cases, it does not.
+1
Even IF the camera is obsolete in two years ... which is absolutely false ... it is very rare for a lens mount to become obsolete in two years. Not to say that the SOME mounts haven't gone by the wayside of current production, but mount obsolescence is something that occurs over a MUCH longer period of time than just a couple years.
But, if you've modified a non-production mount to a current production mount, then you've actually converted the "obsolete" mount into to something viable.
The comment is (imo) a hyperbolic statement to infer the value of glass vs. bodies. Granted, as technology marches on for bodies, the advances in two years see increases. But, the point of obsolescence being reached in two years is bizzarro (imo). Will today's "cutting edge" camera be yesterday's news in two years when a new "cutting edge" gizmo arrives. Sure, why not. But, that in no way renders the former camera obsolete.
As to the list ... a lot in there to digest. 
|