freaklikeme Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #5 · p.1 #5 · 50MP Fuji compared to 40MP Phase One on Hasselblad | |
I haven't used them in that set-up, but I have used the 40MP sensor in an H3D 40 and currently own the GFX 50sII. At base ISO, the 40MP sensor is capable of great things once you've got your back set for your color preferences. You can't stray much from base before you'll need to rely on noise reduction software to get a clean image and, even at base, you'll need to rely on light modifiers (ND grads, fill light) or exposure blending to avoid having to push the files much in post.
The 50MP sensor is one I've used in multiple set-ups, and its dynamic range is no joke. And Fuji gives you all the same color control you'd get from an older Phase back and then some. Fuji really aced the implementation of the sensor with the 50sII.
The shooting experience is vastly different. The 50sII is relatively tiny and feels nothing like shooting with a 501. If the chimney finder/OVF and the overall experience of the Hassy is key, I'd look for an IQ150 or CFV (II) 50. If it had to be a CCD based back, I'd save for the P65+ or IQ160. They aren't much more flexible than the 40, but you'll take a substantially bigger bite out the V lenses' ICs.
Just my two cents. I hope it helps.
|