Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              48      
49
       end
  

Canon R7

  
 
Imagemaster
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #1 · p.49 #1 · Canon R7


arbitrage wrote:
Why those exposure settings? All you got is a motion blurred goldfinch


Well how about I was just trying out eye-AF on a dull rainy day handheld at 1/60 sec. It locked on the eye, which was the point of the image.

---------------------------------------------

arbitrage wrote:
Once the rest of us reach the status of "master" we won't have those issues either


Unlike some, I don't make ignorant assumptions about what usernames people use or what they mean. I guess if I wanted to be some "master", like some others need to be, I would have to own the most expensive Canon, Sony, and Nikon bodies and lenses to impress others.

To educate yourself, and a few others, Google "imagemaster" and see how many million hits you come up with. They are not all me and most of them have nothing to do with photography. JFYI, it was a registered business name I used for a number of years when I was selling my prints along with Limited Edition Prints by Robert Bateman, Carl Brenders, Andrew Kiss, Ron Parker, Howard Terpning, etc. etc.

Pardon me that I chose a business name that indicated to the consumer that I was selling images by master artists. Pretty sure that posting here for over 18 years I have never claimed to be a master photographer.

Did you just get bored posting swallows in-flight over at the Sony Forum?



Jul 05, 2022 at 07:06 PM
duncang
Online
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #2 · p.49 #2 · Canon R7


KINGOFKNGS wrote:
I have very rarely noted the wobble with the R3/R5 and the RF600. On the R7 itís very dramatic and very notable when it happens, but usually there are enough photos in the burst that I can pick out unaffected images. Ideally there wouldnít be any wobble, obviously.



Have you noticed it with the R3 ? The R5 readout speed is faster than the R7 so you would expect it to be less noticeable but I wouldn't expect to see it with the R3 at all.




Jul 05, 2022 at 07:32 PM
duncang
Online
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #3 · p.49 #3 · Canon R7


Imagemaster wrote:
Well how about I was just trying out eye-AF on a dull rainy day handheld at 1/60 sec. It locked on the eye, which was the point of the image.

---------------------------------------------

Unlike some, I don't make ignorant assumptions about what usernames people use or what they mean. I guess if I wanted to be some "master", like some others need to be, I would have to own the most expensive Canon, Sony, and Nikon bodies and lenses to impress others.

To educate yourself, and a few others, Google "imagemaster" and see how many million hits you come up with. They are
...Show more

The point generally is to get in focus images.

The R7 is not perfect but for the most part works in quite difficult situations. The A1 doesn't exactly shine in many of these situations either.







Why you would want to take pictures in the situation below I don't know, but each to their own...




















This works well where there is no foreground/background in the same horizontal plane














This not so much as the camera will often get confuse by the foreground/background and focus will wander off and needs a lot of encouragement. I have not tried different 'stickiness' settings.








In bushes/reeds it is good at finding the subject but not so consistent with actually getting the eye in focus.

























































Jul 05, 2022 at 07:57 PM
arbitrage
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #4 · p.49 #4 · Canon R7


Imagemaster wrote:
Did you just get bored posting swallows in-flight over at the Sony Forum?


Pretty much...just perusing what toy I should buy next....but probably will head over to the M43 forums for that.



Jul 05, 2022 at 08:11 PM
KINGOFKNGS
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #5 · p.49 #5 · Canon R7


I have to go back and look. I never really noticed anything until I saw Janís comments on his video a month or so ago. I predominantly shoot with the R3. I have noticed it in the past month when reviewing series of photos, but I canít remember which body. Iíll try to look through some shots in the next couple days.

duncang wrote:
Have you noticed it with the R3 ? The R5 readout speed is faster than the R7 so you would expect it to be less noticeable but I wouldn't expect to see it with the R3 at all.





Jul 05, 2022 at 08:14 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

bobbytan
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #6 · p.49 #6 · Canon R7


The OM-1 + 150-400 Pro rocks. Mitesh is having so much fun he has not touched his A1 since he picked up the OM-1 .... his words, not mine:

https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1762843/0#15980061

Even Alex Phan jumped on the OM-1 bandwagon. The 150-400 Pro is a must-have, of course.

arbitrage wrote:
Pretty much...just perusing what toy I should buy next....but probably will head over to the M43 forums for that.





Jul 05, 2022 at 08:19 PM
armd
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #7 · p.49 #7 · Canon R7


mdees88 wrote:
Looks like Duade had the same issue I did with birds on the ground and the AF jumping between the bird and the background.

https://youtu.be/Dk8T2OlfS90


The warping occurred when he was shooting relatively static subjects and wasnít panning. I suspect this is an IS issue which was observed on the earlier Cannon MILC and lenses. If I recall correctly, there were firmware updates for both the cameras and lenses. Good review and very promising.



Jul 05, 2022 at 10:00 PM
docusync
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #8 · p.49 #8 · Canon R7




bobbytan wrote:
The OM-1 + 150-400 Pro rocks. Mitesh is having so much fun he has not touched his A1 since he picked up the OM-1 .... his words, not mine:

https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1762843/0#15980061

Even Alex Phan jumped on the OM-1 bandwagon. The 150-400 Pro is a must-have, of course.



A 150-400/4.5 m4/3 lens would be a 300-800/9 FF equivalent. With the 1.25x TC itís a 375-1000/11.25 equivalent. The R5 + 800/11 to me seems like a better option since you still have a 45Mpx sensor to crop (vs just 20Mpx OM-1). Yes, the OM-1 is more than twice faster (50fps), and Pro Capture is really awesome, but considering equivalence, it maybe not as miraculous as it sounds.



Jul 05, 2022 at 10:57 PM
bobbytan
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #9 · p.49 #9 · Canon R7


The 150-400 Pro at 1,000mm is f5.6 which is great for low light shooting. And the image quality of this lens is way better than the cheap RF 800/11 consumer-grade lens.

docusync wrote:
A 150-400/4.5 m4/3 lens would be a 300-800/9 FF equivalent. With the 1.25x TC itís a 375-1000/11.25 equivalent. The R5 + 800/11 to me seems like a better option since you still have a 45Mpx sensor to crop (vs just 20Mpx OM-1). Yes, the OM-1 is more than twice faster (50fps), and Pro Capture is really awesome, but considering equivalence, it maybe not as miraculous as it sounds.




Jul 05, 2022 at 11:20 PM
1       2       3              48      
49
       end






FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              48      
49
       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username      Reset password