SpecFoto Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #13 · p.3 #13 · What makes m4/3 system more fun than other systems? | |
Been shooting with Olympus M4/3 since 2012, added Sony FF in 2018 and continue use both systems to this day. Each has it advantages, but for a general overview it is the weight and cost savings that drew me to Olympus back in 2012. No where is this more evident than in the 2 standard f2.8 zooms that many consider critical for any camera system.
Today Sony is announcing their updated version II of the 24-70 f2.8 zoom, it weights in at 695g, about 190g less than the previous version. This follows a few months back the updated version II of the 70-200 f2.8 which weighs 1045g, previous version was 1480g! Compare this to my Olympus M. Zuiko 2 zoom f2.8 setup. The 12-40 f2.8 Pro has an additional 10mm of reach vs. the Sony and weighs 382g, a bit more than 1/2 the weight. My 40-150 f2.8 Pro has 100mm of additional natural reach vs. the Sony 70-200 (both accept tc's) and weighs 760g including the tripod collar, which I took off, it is closer to 720g. Combined the 2 M. Zuiko zooms weight savings are about 650g, they are fully weather sealed, a full metal build, a constant f2.8, have 100mm more reach and tremendous IQ. And I have been happily shooting with this pair for 8 years. Price wise, the M. Zuiko 12-40 and 40-150 can be both be bought for $2,350. This is $50 more than just the updated Sony 24-70 f2.8 ALONE at $2,300. Add $2,800 for the Sony 70-200 for a total of $5,100, or 117% more, for the Sony pair that weighs almost a pound and a half more and has 100mm less reach.
For my overseas travel I take these 2 M. Zuiko zooms along with the 17mm f1.2 Pro and the Nocticron 42.5mm f1.2, though on my next trip I want to try out my Sigma 56 f1.4 instead of the Noct. Combined these 4 excellent lenses weigh just about the same as the pair of updated Sony zooms, but includes the luxury of having a couple of very fast, low light primes along. Huge advantage when traveling with M4/3 to me.
|