mawz Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
INteresting idea, but Nikon missed a huge opportunity to fill real gaps in teh lineup.
Nikon currently offers 5 mid-range zooms in FX and 2 more in DX.
Nikon offers exactly one telezoom, with a second on the way fairly shortly, both high-dollar lenses.
Tamron has an excellent and diminutive 70-180/2.8 in E mount that’s the size & weight of a 70-200/4, as well as a good consumer 70-300 that’s smaller and lighter than Nikon’s F-mount 70-300E even before you take the FTZ into account. Either of those would have solved real problems in the Z lineup for Nikon. The 28-75 does not do anything except confuse the mid-range, offering a 24-70/4 and a 28-75/2.8 in the same space and rough cost range.
Unless you really need f2.8 and can’t spring for the 24-70 (or get a used 24-70G on an FTZ), the cheaper and smaller 24-70/4 S is the better choice every time for the Z shooter.
|