ChrisMak Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
PB_James wrote:
.....I agree with you about Sony RAW files, the default colors just look wrong to me and take a lot of fiddling to get right (owned both an RX100 and A6000 back in the day).
I had a Nikon Z7 with the Z24S and Z50S lenses. I switched from a Sony A7RII with three Zeiss Loxia lenses, planning to go "one system" and adapt the 500PF to the Z7.
The Sony A7RII indeed always involved a lot of needless work in raw to get a balanced look, due to blocked shadows and blown skies in higher contrast, or oversaturation in more subdued outside lighting. Colors were nice and punchy, but lacked finesse, and the same goes for tonality: nice and contrasty but lacking the fine gradations.
Still I could not get along with the Nikon colors either, just a bit too austere for me, lacking the luscious warmth of the Sony colors.
So I switched back, re-bought the Loxia 25, added the 35GM, and got the Sony A7RIV. To me that is the best body (IQ wise) that I have yet owned, I don't feel it involves more work in raw post processing than the Z7 at all, DR is similar with a slight edge to the 64 iso on the Z7, but all I do with the A7RIV is set exposure, highlights and shadows and that's it.
It all shows the very subjective nature of what good colors are, although I admit that it took the A7RIV to get beyond the fiddling with the A7RII files. I simply prefer Sony color rendering, 6 months with the Z7 did not get that out of my system. If you want to do a fair comparison though, start with the A7RIV, anything before that and you sell Sony short.
|