YumMango Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.7 #9 · p.7 #9 · Voigtlander 50mm f/1.5 Heliar Classic Review | |
phinix wrote:
Would you say 50mm Nokton 1.5 II is better than Heliar Classic? Like, closer to 40/1.2 better?
The Nokton 1.5 offers solid performance at a good price point with favorable size and weight. Much better reviewers than I note the lens turns softer at distances closer than 2 meters.
Speaking just for myself, I don't shoot a lot of 50mm so having a small but good 50mm (and economical!) hits the sweet spot. But that said, because I don't shoot a lot at 50mm, I think I prefer a lens with more character if I reach for this focal range. I think 50mm has a more "romantic" feel than my preferred focal length of 35mm, so if I'm going romantic I might as well lean into that. This is why I actually like the Heliar Classic better.
Is the Heliar Classic a better lens? No, at least not in the ordinary sense. I'd say the vast majority of people should consider the Nokton, especially if it's your first or primary lens. But that is cautious and measured advice. And this is photography, where being cautious and measured is sometimes the flaw itself. The reality is that for most photos, the differences are small enough that I don't care. Now if like me you take photos wide open then you will encounter differences that are more pronounced. And sometimes the differences matter.
Take a look at FM's test photos of both lenses. He does a nice job of demonstrating their output and he notes the differences. Look at the "2 meter distance at f/1.4 or f/1.5" photos of the Heliar Classic. Does the glow on the license plate or the badge bother you? The glow might bug me, especially on a photo like that where I want to blur the background but get accurate reporting of the car. So that is an example where just about any other lens is a better choice. But look at his other samples, especially where FM leans into the dreaminess. Now I love the results. Look at the cactuses on Sample 6. Just lovely. Now look at his family photos from November 13. These are more "normal" photos and less romantic. I think the lens is doing a solid job with "everyday" shooting. I could care less that his daughter's shoes are glowing in the last of the cheerleading photos. Similarly, there is a glow on his daughter's face on the second shot. The glow might bother other people but not me.
Consider the close up photos Dana Scruggs took for the New York Times of Jann Wenner on September 10, 2022: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/10/style/jann-wenner.html I have no idea what lens she used but I'm guessing it might be a 50mm (or perhaps more). The black and white photos are "flawed" in traditional terms but they are fantastic images complete with bold lens qualities. I've taken too many boring photos in my life. I think that I'd rather have more flawed photos.
|