RSK01 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Thank you so much for the detailed reply.
After using the Om-1 with the 150-400mm setup for 2 months, I do miss the Sony's customisation abilities. But the 150-400mm lens is really quite unbelievable for a zoom lens. It's sharp enough wide open, and the f4.5 (or f5.6 with TC on), is really an advantage. For the Sony 200-600mm, to get great results, usually I have to stop it down slightly to f7.1or f8.
Now I wish I have 2 OM-1, one with the 12-100mm f4 or the 40-150mm f2.8, and the other with the 150-400mm. My other Olympus body is a very old EM10ii (I use it mainly for star trails for lightning, using the live composite function).
mitesh wrote:
Hi Simon,
The tight portrait is about 75-80% of the original frame. Due to the proximity of the subject, cropping slightly didn’t affect the detail level. As for your safari trip, I’d likely choose the OM combo. The only reasons I would choose the Sony combo over the OM combo are:
1. You customize multiple buttons for different shooting/exposure presets and that is very important to you.
2. You can fill the frame and want/need high MP count for your method of display.
3. You need/want more reliable C-AF tracking.
4. You need/want files with better DR/processing latitude.
Other than those reasons, I can’t think of any other reason to take Sony over OM. These advantages don’t exist in every situation and are dependent upon many factors, including proper image capture. The OM combo offers advantages that are more meaningful to me. Just my opinions, of course, and others may not agree....Show more →
|