Holger Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
arbitrage wrote:
* Switching to Release is not an official Sony thing to get 30FPS. However, many who have tested including Mark Galer and myself did find that Balanced didn't reach 30FPS. I actually got 30FPS in Release and in Focus priority but that was just shooting my phones stopwatch (in order to get enough precision for the test). Oddly, Balanced shooting that same stopwatch didn't get 30FPS. I would expect Focus priority would not reach 30FPS once in the field under trying conditions. Regardless, I've always shot every camera I've owned in Release priority if they have that option. I don't believe the camera is accurate enough to know if it is really going to be in focus at 30FPS so Balanced and Focus priority are just going to miss you potentially great shots.
*I'm still mostly using Zone and Wide for BIF depending on how small and erratic the bird is. I'm still using the non-tracking version. I use Tracking version of Zone, Expand and Small Flex Spot for non flight depending on the clutter surrounding the bird. The thing is that in a non-tracking version of Flex Spot it will only find and track the eye within the small area of the Flex Spot. If you are in Tracking version then once it finds the eye it will track it across the entire frame. So I often will use the Flex Spots to hone in on the correct place for the camera to look for the eye and then hit my AF-ON button to switch the Flex Spot to Tracking and recompose with eye tracking working. If you just use Wide or even Zone in a cluttered surrounding then the camera won't always "see" the eye when presented with everything else in the frame. This was the same on the R5...you needed to use a small AF point to get the bird in focus and then switch over to full frame Eye-AF once you had sort of told the camera where to look with the small focus point. The Sony system is more flexible in the ways you can use all the AF modes in conjunction with the Eye-AF.
*I don't aim for higher SS compared to lower MP cameras. I never have. I've been shooting this type of resolution since my 7D2 days and have had many similar pixel density cameras (5DSR, D850, D500, A7RIV, R5) ever since and I've never adjusted shutter speeds with those cameras compared to my 20 odd MP FF cameras like 1DX, 1DXII, A9.
*Yes, I believe the 1.4 is still worth using on the A1. But I don't use it as much as with the A9. I do prefer to shoot an A1 with 200-600 over an A9 with 200-600/1.4. Still when I need even more reach I have found the 200-600/1.4 on the A1 to work well....Show more →
"*I don't aim for higher SS compared to lower MP cameras. I never have. I've been shooting this type of resolution since my 7D2 days and have had many similar pixel density cameras (5DSR, D850, D500, A7RIV, R5) ever since and I've never adjusted shutter speeds with those cameras compared to my 20 odd MP FF cameras like 1DX, 1DXII, A9"
I do, because for me it makes a difference, since pixel density is one thing, but I usually have equal effective AOV and therefore more pixels/arc length with my A1/A7riv vs. A9ii. Esp. when first using the A7riv I recognised the need to use clearly higher shutter speeds, esp. when shooting 85mm at portrait distances.
In your case there probably is a safe SS speed which you probably use anyway, as you expected to crop even your A9 images quite clearly?
|