Bruce n Philly Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #3 · p.3 #3 · Canon R5 - Tracking Box is Inconsistent with Results - Animal Eye AF | |
TeamSpeed wrote:
I always go to my experience with Canon gear first, the owner's manual second, forums third, and Canon last. So far, I have never had to go Canon, my answers have been obtained from one or more of the first 3 methods.
Canon has been overwhelmingly great for me over the years except for two times, both with the R5.... one time, with the R5, a rep started reading from the manual to me... ok ... gotta go. The other the rep didn't understand the the bit-depth issue relating to shutter type and H+.... but ultimately, it got to someone there who did.
The forums have been great... except for two issues... the use of a PD battery where I got negative commentary... "frying the thing" etc... and my animal eye detect flaky behavior where ... well ... I just didn't get what I thought were good responses from the forums.... Canon won this one as the rep just gave me a dead-pan answer "use zone instead"... in other words, yes it doesn't always work so in those cases use zone. Given that most posters appears to not have the eye detect issues I experienced... I still wonder if my camera is behaving up to standard. The tone in the eye-detect thread ... well I felt it was bit tilted that I wasn't doing something correctly. Why just today, I was tracking one of the last Short Eared owls... I put it on full animal eye detect and the blue squares were all over the frame... put it in zone and pow... right on the owl.
Anywho, with a camera as complex as this one, there is great value to both avenues for information. But I found the forums exceptionally good for understanding a given menu option as the manual is pretty blech with this stuff. And my biggest surprise of forum value, identifying a focus problem that was really atmosphere interference.. that was good one for me!
Peace
Bruce in Philly
|