WillR Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
nehemiahphoto wrote:
Thanks for doing this.
I don't see the bokeh as that close on these two lenses though "close" is personally defined. There's a difference in AOV, but 65 to has way better axial CA control (not surprising), much smoother bokeh, less cat's eye, and better contrast. Good illustrative test.
Well perhaps what I wrote on my opinion of the bokeh was imprecise. I agree that the bokeh is better on the Sigma 65, but I don't think the bokeh of the 55 is bad.
When evaluating a lens I'm maybe a little less analytical than the norm on FM. I tend to respond to an overall feel. Basically, I'm looking for "wows" and ughs".
When I look at the Sigma 65 the "wow" for me is the contrast and color separation in the plane fo focus. In particular, I give a wow to the back of the bench in the first set of photos.
My ughs for the FE 55 are mainly the CA in the second set. The rest of its bokeh is fine with me, if not quite as good as the Sigma 65.
I do think the FE 55 is a good lens, aside from the CA. I like its size, and how quick the autofocus is. But for my needs the Sigma 65 fits my kit better.
-Will
|