Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
Final Thoughts
Overall, the Sigma 65mm f/2 DG DN lens is an excellent performer and I highly recommend it.
Weighing in at 405 grams, it is the heaviest lens in the Sigma I series - but still remains compact for a short telephoto f/2 lens. Like its peers, it's built with tight tolerance and has solid optical performance.
The Sigma 65mm f/2 DG DN is virtually flat-field at infinity distance which is great news for landscape photographers. The biggest surprise to me is the super low axial and lateral chromatic aberration, even competing with the Voigtlander 65mm f/2 APO-Lanthar, our best performer in regards to CA.
Although more corrected for spherical aberration compared to the other lenses in the series, residual SA is still present, which in turn contributes to a smooth and pleasant focus transition zone, without denigrating much resolution or contrast wide open.
The lens also has low optical vignetting which means that the off-axis specular highlights' shape is still somewhat round instead of having a distracting cat-eye shape. Flare resistance and distortion (pincushion) are average compared to other 55-65mm lenses.
Pros:- High resolution/contrast at infinity even wide open
- Smooth rendering at close and mid-distance
- Flat-field design (very low field curvature)
- Strong mid-field performance (Better than the 65mm f/2 APO at wide apertures)
- Tight tolerance metal build including features like aperture ring and AF-MF button
- Linear manual focus response
- Very low axial and lateral color error
- Well defined 18-point sunstar at f/20-22
- Better than average optical vignetting
Average:- AF not as accurate as Sony lenses in AF-C including Eye-AF
- Noticeable pincushion distortion
- Flare resistance is just average with visible ghosting when shooting against the light
Cons:- Not much to report, except that it's the most expensive Sigma I Series lens
____________
Order the Sigma 65mm f/2 DG DN: B&H Photo | Adorama
|