aCuria Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
DavidBM wrote:
While what you say is true, at medium distances it’s sensationally sharp even wide open, sharper in my experience than the Sony 1.8. The limitations are really only within a metre or so of mfd and wide aperture. If that combination is important to you, sure it can be a deal breaker. Personally I use wide apertures at longer distances where separation is otherwise reduced, and tend to shoot stopped down a little close to mfd on most lenses.
I frequently find myself within a meter of the minimum focusing distance (MFD) when using a 35mm lens. This occurs often when I'm taking photographs, such as when capturing close-up portraits of my young children, shooting tighter portraits of my partner seated across the table during dinner outings, or photographing food, among other scenarios.
I employ both zoom lenses and prime lenses in my photography. I tend to opt for prime lenses in situations with low light or when I desire greater background separation. These scenarios demand a wide aperture, so being forced to stop down significantly significantly restricts the versatility of a prime lens for me.
Previously, I've been somewhat bothered by the limited maximum magnification of the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (0.15x) and the Sony 55mm/1.8 ZA lenses. The 0.18x magnification offered by the 35/2 lens is pushing the limits of what I find satisfactory in this regard.
Nevertheless, my experience with a 35mm lens is shaped by my personal photography style, and other photographers may encounter these limitations less frequently. That being said, I believe it's important to exercise caution when recommending the 35/2 DG DN lens without first understanding whether or not the potential limitations would apply to the individual's photography needs. The 35GM, on the other hand, is a more straightforward recommendation in this regard, and I'd venture to say it even outperforms the 35/2 DG DN in terms of sharpness.
|