MedicineMan404 Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
dallvr wrote:
Thanks for posting these photos! I have been curious about this lens, because after getting the 200-600, I now have to carry 3 lenses attached to 3 bodies to get the 24-600 range when I go on safari. This lens would take me down to two lenses on two bodies for a 28-600 range. It looks very sharp, which is encouraging. I tried the Sony 24-240 and didn't find it to be sharp enough. If I get the 28-200, I will have to decide whether to part with my 100-400 and/or 24-105.
Parting with the 100400GM is a hard hard decision it is such a stellar lens....easier decision for me since I rarely used the 24-105. It too is a fantastic lens, just not one I grabbed very often.
My travel, wildlife, what-if, do it all Sony kit is now-
Tam 17-28 (abs. love this one)
Tam 28-200 (again not a range I shoot in often)
Sony 200-600 (was my bread-n-butter on the Alaska trip and several trips since)
I was fretting over the 24GM. Have it love it, would be hard to part with it; but still wanting something wider for Milky Way shots. I had the Batis 18 but never did like its fly-wire focus system, at all. THEN I rememberd I have the little Rokinon FE 18mm, so my 3 lens travel kit becomes 4 but the little 18mm barely counts but punches leagues beyond its price. Even Ian Norman,the Milky Way guru, likes it.
|