Scott Stoness Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
technic wrote:
I thought the rumor about an APS-C sensor R camera (and no plans for APS-C R lenses) was more interesting.
If confirmed that would mean that for ML Canon body you either buy a relatively modest spec (especially regarding AF, build quality etc.), affordable and light/compact EOS-M (compact/light mostly because of the 2/22 and a few other M lenses) - or a highend (probably faster and more capable AF?), very expensive APS-C R body that is forced to use primarily very big/heavy/expensive R lenses. Yes, such an APS-C R body could use other lenses (but not EOS M) with mount adapters, but that doesn't make much sense.
At some point the current conundrum of EOS-M and EOS R and future upgrade path needs to be resolved ;(...Show more →
I hope they keep the M. I have the M5 and its a perfect hiking, day time body with fantastic light lens (22/2, 11-22, 15-45 and 55-200) . In daylight its hard to do better than this system. And in a pinch you can adapt larger lens. But the really great thing about the M is the very small light and pretty good lens.
The R at 45mpx (or 75mpx) could be made to work in APSC mode electronically. Its seems redundant.
|