alundeb Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
RoamingScott wrote:
Still trying to suss out early shill reviews from real world experiences.
So far it sounds like:
Sony +
- Considerably longer battery life
- Can still shoot HI+ with AF-C until the battery dies
- Sony runs better from external batteries
- Can record maximum amount of 4K without any heat issues
- Better IQ at base ISO to around ISO 800 due to Canon "cheating" and using baked in noise reduction at low ISO
Canon +
- Faster burst while battery life allows for it
- Better IBIS
- Higher Res EVF
- Better video capability before it overheats
- CFE support
- Possibly better weather sealing, needs more user testing
- Seemingly better AF, but need more user testing as preliminary user testing is show lower keeper rates in post than the shooting experience indicated
Tie
- Image Quality beyond ISO 800 or so
- Overall speed of UI
I think Canon made an ok camera and totally failed to market it correctly. It appears that they have a significant engineering oversight with the bare CPU that was very possibly intentional to cripple the video. It's a perplexing release....Show more →
Thanks, interesting bullet point lists. As I don't own any of the cameras, I cannot comment on the validity, but I might have an opinion about the importance of each point. I would have to say that the +A7rIII list is rather thin as far as a "more capable camera" goes. In the end, maybe everything will boil down to AF keeper rate, but that will be hard to compare.
Since you gave balanced lists, I would also like to add a couple of + point for the R5:
- Animal AF (you may have included that in "Seemingly better AF"
- Much faster sensor scan rate with electronic shutter.
As it stands, my opinion is that the R5 is a more capable camera than the A7rIIi. That is not important for me to point out, I just want to see you eat bacon boots or whatever
|