RogerZoul Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Seems to me that in this set of shots, if you believe that the camera actually got focus, that the focus square is over a spot that has something forward and some back, rather than just a mostly flat area with detail. Depending on where the focus sensor actually is, the camera could be just picking the nearest thing, or the best thing. In the shot with the little boy, it seems partially on his nose and then on the other part on his face. What did it grab? And in all of the other shots, I seem a similar thing. In the shot on the edge of his face, well the focus is more on the tree in the background than his face. Also, in all of these shots, I think I would aim at the eye or a part of the face close to the eye. Edges can be good too, because of the detail, but they can also be dodgy too, as you seem to be seeing here. I’m not saying there is no problem with your camera, but I think I’d either try to focus a slight bit differently or I would pick some examples where your edge detail, or contrast, is mostly in the same plane. If the detail crosses out of one plane as seen in the square, then it could end up well off of where you intended it to be.
I hope this helps some as I am not trying to troll you. Good luck.
csebasti wrote:
Back in March last year I posted about issues I was having with my 5D IV autofocus:
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1585948/0
After getting lots of good advice, I sent my camera and Canon 24-105 f/4L lens to cannon. A couple weeks and ~$200 later, they returned them saying the body, the sensor out of position and the image was blurred. For the lens they said adjustment of the assembly was incorrect and the image was blurred. Both were electrically and mechanically adjusted.
I got the camera back in late June. I still don't believe the camera is working as it should as I still get a lot of missed focus as I used to. Less significant than before, but still missed. I have examples from July just after getting the camera back all the way to recent shots. Both front and back focus. I have not messed with micro adjust since getting the camera/lens back.
I'm planning to call Canon back, but would like some advise on how to deal with them. I'm afraid they'll just tell me to send it back and pay another $200 (or more) to have them "fix" it again. It has been 6 months since they fixed it after all. I'm hoping maybe some of you have more experience working with Canon Factory Service than I do, and how I should approach this.
Some examples after the camera/lens were serviced. 1st 3 are with the lens they serviced:
Doesn't look too bad small, but zooming it it is clear the focus is on his shoulder, not where the focus point is.
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-27549.jpg
Focus point:
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-27549 FP.jpg
Zoomed in:
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-27549-2.jpg
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-28626.jpg
Focus point:
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-28626 FP.jpg
Zoomed in, shoe in focus, not where the focus point is:
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-28626-2.jpg
Significant miss in focus. But, maybe related to low light, and the focus point is right on the edge of his face. But still, the camera shouldn't think it achieved focus if it didn't.
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-29551.jpg
Focus point:
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-29551 FP.jpg
Using a different lens. This is with a Canon 85 f/1.8. Focus is clearly much farther in front of where the focus point is.
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-30075.jpg
Focus point:
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-30075 FP.jpg
Zoomed in:
http://bc-sebastian.com/forum/focus/19-30075-2.jpg
...Show more →
|