TeamSpeed Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #14 · p.2 #14 · Why no 1DxIII "reviews" from Sports photographers? | |
rbeasley wrote:
I don't necessarily agree with this. If you give a 1dx or 1dx2 owner a 1dx3 camera to test out they will know quickly whether the camera is an improvement. It may take months to fully evaluate every feature in many circumstances, but in one day I will know if the autofocus is truly massively improved and whether the image quality it better. I will know in a few minutes if I am going to like the touch screen implementation and the new AFON button. The new buffer can be tested within a few minutes. If you have never used a 1D then that may be a different story. It would take me quite some time to know if an A9 was good for me. The 1dx3 I will know very quickly.
...Show more →
The issue here is though that it is opinion at this point, by one individual. You know for your uses whether the camera is better or not, however not all shoot the same things in the same conditions, etc so where things are better for you, they might be worse for someone else.
To really provide a "review" and not a "preview" or "my feelings" type of article or video, 1-2 days won't cut it. Others care a little about the opinion of the reviewer, depending on their reputation and how aligned they are with what they shoot, but count more on the actual bonafide data/image comparisons, etc considering that is where the rubber meets the road.
Like the DigitalRev videos, they were a bit entertaining, and provided some useful info, but they weren't reviews even though they were touted as such, and those did take days, if not weeks to produce before adding to Youtube. Fro videos are a bit further yet, with more info but also alot more opinion, while still being somewhat entertaining, and again, I suspect those take quite some time to put together.
Other reviews like Imaging Resource or DPReview are more detailed and objective, and take longer yet.
|