Wilbus Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
@Sagar, the 100-400 EF II USM lens above is 1570g (3,46lbs) without the tripod collar. 94x193mm in size (3,66x7,6 inches)
The 100-500 looks a bit beefier and longer, if the glass and build quality is the same I would expect some more weight. Unless they have pulled off some nice material change and glass change that is to more exotic glass and lighter materials.
The Oly 300mm F4 is 1270g with the tripod collar (2,8lbs) and and 8,93 inches long and the same width.
The Canons are also shorter in focal length but with the added benefit of being zooms of course. Judging from other Canon glass price I expect the 100-500 to be quite a bit more expensive (the 100-400 is about the same price as the Oly 300F4). But we'll see 
The shorter length can be made up by higher resolution sensor of course and the slower lenses are easily made up for by a sensor that is at least two stops better in ISO so it's hard to say which would be the better choice.
/Rasmus
|