retrofocus Online Upload & Sell: Off
|
I think this is a very interesting thread (thanks, Steve!) since I believe that quite a large number of M/LTM glass users is using them on non-Leica based mirrorless cameras. Reasons for this are known all too well, so no need to dive deep into this which was discussed in other threads. I have only personal experience with combinations of M/LTM-lenses on my A7R camera (as shown above), but I am reading that many of these lenses seem to work very well on Z6/Z7 cameras also. Not so much info comes out with latest FF Panasonic MLCs, but from what I am reading online with a very limited number of M lenses tested is that they don't perform there as good as anticipated. There is always the option to have the sensor modified with KolariVision and a thinner glass cover, but first this is adding some cost and second then the camera is more limited to rangefinder glass only.
I am using now to more than 80% of time when shooting M-lenses on my A7R - it works so well for me that I never saw the need to get any E-mount lens. My shooting style does not require AF, I even prefer manual focusing. The size of the first A7-series camera series is perfect for my needs - in fact I prefer it over the successor models with thicker handgrip and more bulky built. For rangefinder lenses, the smaller camera layout is better IMO.
To the general public it still seems fairly unknown that MLCs allow to use different branded lenses on cameras. I made this experience a few weeks ago when entering a library after shooting fall photos in my neighborhood and had the A7R with vintage Leica 90/4 Elmar lens dangling from my shoulder. The younger librarian asked me what kind of camera this since she never saw this kind of metallic lens. She was very surprised to hear how old the lens was and that it can be adapted to newer camera systems. Even in photo groups nearly all other MLC shooters stick to the same camera-lens brand environment and are surprised to see me using other lens brands on my A7R.
|