naturephoto1 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
AGeoJO wrote:
Rich, in general there are 2 methods here. The first is to use flash as fill-in; you rely on available light to be the main lighting for your target. In a similar fashion, this the way a reflector is used. I used both fill-in flash and reflector for quite a bit of images from Costa Rica back then.
The second way is to use flash as the main lighting source. Here, the aperture controls the amount of flash on your target. Your flash output will be determined by the aperture needed. The amount of ambient light is controlled by the shutter speed. Here, if you don’t use flash, the general exposure is about 2-stop under. You may want to use the maximum shutter speed the light enables you to to minimize ghosting. Again, the keyword, is to “minimize”. You can get away without ghosting if your flash system works using hi-speed sync. For my taste though, the effect looks too “flashy”. I prefer the images to be like what you see above. Just enough to freeze the wing blur and to get an extended depth-of-field but mixed with some ambient light to create the 3D-effect. The idea here is to make your flashed images not to look too much “flash is used”. Hope this helps.
Joshua
...Show more →
Hi Joshua,
I have used projected flash both as a main as well as a fill flash. So, if I am understanding you, you used the flash as a fill as well as using a reflector. Did you use 2 flash units then, one as a fill and then one as shot into a relector or did you have light reflected into the image? Maybe I am misunderstaning you somewhat. Also, for the fill flash did you just use a flash without a magnifier to narrow the beam or did you use something to narrow the beam and to adjust for fill by setting the flash output 2 stops under exposed from ambient?
Thanks.
Rich
|