Arka Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
NRKStudio wrote:
Guy, congrats on your health. I don’t know you, but still, congrats.
I definitely agree that the 75 Lux is like the CV75 in that they have two much diff looks from Wide open to then stopped down. The big difference is that the CV is much better corrected for CA and Is much higher resolving wide open.
Bokeh is a little bit smoother, but as it’s been said, the colors are just so rich on the Summilux. Also, it’s not just the resolution that’s different, it’s the low amount of contrast and micro-contrast that makes skin tones so smooth on the Lux. Colors kind of bleed together, even though you can make out some details. By low micro contrast I mean the edges of lines blur into each other, though the lines are still apparent.
I think that’s the best part of the Lux. The 75 Lux doesn’t really glow like the old 35 Lux, the Canon 50/.95, or even the new CV 50/1.2 @f1.2@. It just looks smooth and rich.
Check out my previous post of the lens chart shot with the 75 Lux and CV75/1.5. You can see how quick the drop off is on the CV and how much tighter the details look. The CV does have that ability to capture color and tone gradients really well, and according to Erwin Putts the 75 Lux is just the same with that.
The optical design is very similar to the 75 Lux as well, albeit with an added aspherical lens at the back and another element slid in the front geoup.
With resolving ability similar to the 65/2 APO, and smooth rendering and great colors, I believe this CV75 will definitely be one of Voigtlanders modern day legends.
...Show more →
Interesting. I like that CV (and love the light weight), but I think I'll be keeping my 75 'Lux.
|