ilkka_nissila Online Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #20 · p.1 #20 · QXD Cards are they the new standard This is the 3rd post in a series trying to educate myself on Nikons new Tech | |
XQD cards cost about the same as tough SD cards (which are slower and have exposed contacts easily soiled and subject to corrosion).
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1261719-REG/sony_qdg32e_j_32_xqd_g_series.html
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1437903-REG/sony_sf_g32t_t1_32gb_sf_g_series_tough.html
You can find other manufacturers also make similar products, e.g. rugged SD cards by Delkin. I think XQD pricing closely follows the market in features and quality, and is not particularly expensive.
CFexpress cards will probably also follow the pricing of other cards according to what value they have to the users. Faster cards will be more expensive than XQD and cards which are similarly specified as XQD will probably have similar pricing. These products do not exist in a vacuum. For SD, slow cards are really cheap, but these limit the speed and usability of high-resolution cameras. The longevity of SD cards is questionable at best. I have had 5 SD cards in use in my DSLRs and two of them continue to work (two stopped working entirely and there was data corruption on the third). I have shot many more images with XQD cards (than SD) and none of them have had a glitch of any kind. Thus the products are not really comparable in any way.
In the past XQD cards were made by Sony and Lexar, today Sony and Delkin. Numerous manufacturers have indicated they will bring the next-generation CF express cards to the market thus there should not be lack of availability in the future. "Single vendor" may have been true for a short time but this didn't lead to a skyrocketing of the prices, there was a small increase and that was it.
Sony aim to make their mirrorless cameras as small as conceivably possible, and implementing dual XQD / CFexpress card slots would make them larger, contrary to their aims. Nikon were able to squeeze only one XQD slot in their mirrorless bodies, citing the desire to keep the camera grip small (and inciting a lot of complaints about single card slot). XQD may thus be a better fit for a larger camera body. Sony also have cited the popular demand for dual SD card slots and I recall mention of technical problems with XQD / CF express (I'm not sure what technical problems they have with that, perhaps the architecture of the camera just doesn't use PCI express and they don't want to redesign it).
Edit: In this video interview
https://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2019/07/19/exclusive-sony-addresses-the-missing-features-on-the-a7r-mark-iv
the Sony interviewee notes that there are "challenges in implementation" with XQD/CFexpress, the cards are larger (he talks a lot about how they feel compactness is important), and how the substantial buffer of the A7R IV takes off some of the pressure on the card speed. Also the user acceptance of card format depends on its usage. He notes that there are certain advantages to XQD card in terms of structure and how it's made but that state of the art in SD is pretty robust.
For me what matters is card reliability, speed and ease of handling, and XQD has been a pleasure. I don't want to buy any more SD cards because of the high failure rate they've had in my usage and the high cost of SD UHS-II cards that have top speed.
|