sungphoto Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
amacal1 wrote:
That's kind of what I do now, but I've bumped into issues with that and trying to move quickly. I don't do enough portrait lighting to have a strong "mind's eye" for it. I don't do enough to warrant full studio strobes in addition to speedlights, so I was hoping the AD200 would do enough of both to satisfy me. It very well may, at least more than most things on the market, but I see that a modeling lamp isn't one of its strengths.
Modeling lights are definitely a workflow aid when you're trying to work fast, regardless of your skill level. That said, even the most powerful modeling lights are useful primarily indoors, so if you shoot more outdoors they're not very useful.
The AD200 is kind of like the leatherman of strobes. It can do almost everything decently, is a great value, and a great strobe to learn with, but can't compete with a dedicated studio strobe when it comes to modeling lights.
What problem specifically are you trying to solve? Are you trying to tune your catch light position or strobe position? If it's the former, one trick is simply asking the subject if they can see the surface of the modifier without turning/tilting their head. Angle of incidence of camera/modifier/subject will do the rest, unless the subject has very small eyes or have prominent eyelids (common especially with older people). If it's the latter, honestly just getting a mannequin head and playing with different modifier positions will help you "see light" better longer term than a modeling light.
|