Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

FM Forum Rules
Landscape Posting Guidelines
  

FM Forums | Landscape Photographer | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2019 · Defying Physics

  
 
Mark Metternich
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · Defying Physics


I am almost obsessed with finding new locations in the Southwest desert that have either rarely been photographed or sometimes even never. Even more, I love sharing these sacred places with others.

This crazily balanced table-like rock has got to be over 1000lbs (maybe 7-8 feet wide by a foot thick at places) yet most precariously (seemingly impossible) balancing on a sandstone “stool” maybe 6 inches wide at the top of the base! Unbelievable to see in person! I have never seen this area photographed it is loaded with unbelievable photographic gems!

My only disappointment is that after 4 attempts here, I still have not gotten that ideal light I crave (first blue sky image I have processed in a very long time). I decided to process this anyway.

Thank you for looking!

Great light to you!



DETAILS for the more inquisitive BELOW the image.







Edited to fix a couple dust specks. :)



Edited on Feb 04, 2019 at 07:48 PM · View previous versions



Feb 04, 2019 at 05:14 PM
Mark Metternich
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · p.1 #2 · Defying Physics


Details for the more inquisitive:

The above shot is a 9 shot merge to HDR in Photoshop Lightroom CC.
Then in Photoshop, I used the best exposed main single layer on TOP of the HDR image to just mask in a little bit of the dynamic range needed here and there via masking techniques (Layer Style Blend-If, custom Luminosity Masks, and Photoshops wonderful "Select and Mask" tool).

It is amazing how well the newest iterations of the HDR software works these days on certain images (I am talking about getting some or all of the dynamic range back but not having that often detested "HDR" look).

When doing the masking in Layers, I took advantage of Photoshops lossless RAW Smart Objects. Yes, that tutorial is on the way. Raw Smart Objects allow us to take our images much further than ever before yet still be in Raw! The new tonal, color and detail fidelity is just amazing.

Sony A7R2
Canon 11-24@11mm (cropped to 4x5 aspect ratio)
f/14
9 shot exposure bracket (1/2 a stop).
100 ISO (native ISO)

*BTW, I accidentally stumbled onto a totally new sizing/sharpening method/recipe while spending literally hundreds of hours testing all the upsizing algorithms and sharpening techniques commonly used in our industry (I do this every year in preparation for Robert B Park and my The Ultimate Print Workshop) and I believe this may be an industry game changer! It is not merely a new software or algorithm! It is a concoction of some mad pseudoscientist type of stuff.

Below are 2 examples.

The image below was cropped to less than 15 MP image (shot handheld out of a helicopter, without an ideal lens and not the best possible settings - so it was a bit handicapped, to begin with) and I was hired to make it 80 inches wide!

Well, it turned out with incredible, almost large format type of detail! It is hard to believe how this print turned out! I would never have believed it.

The two samples here are a very small crop of the previous best algorithm in the industry with very advanced sharpening used. The second is my new "hyper detail" technique (which I believe now beats anything previously possible). This crop is at 50% viewing distance (appropriate for evaluating 300ppi prints) of a very small section of a mountain about a mile away! I literally had 20-30 layers testing every conceivable algorithm, software, sharpening and grain simulation technique used in the industry. The first (bad) one is the very best of all methods tested. It was about 100 hours of testing.

The second one does not even resemble the first. I believe this is a significant jump forward in potential image reproduction.

I bring this up because I might make this Balanced Table Rock image to 96 inches, Lumachrome HD out of Nevada Art Printers (many people believe to be the best super gloss photo paper available today) The "Balanced Table Rock" file is natively about 40MP and pretty sharp and clean. If you visit the lab, you might be able to see it there.

All that to say, I believe we are in such exciting times for photography and printmaking.

All the best to you and yours, and great light to you!






Image 1: The current best sizing and sharpening in the industry.







Image 2: New "hyper detail" sizing and sharping innovation.



Edited on Feb 04, 2019 at 06:45 PM · View previous versions



Feb 04, 2019 at 05:18 PM
01Ryan10
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · Defying Physics


That's an awesome looking rock. Photoshop a Star Wars Star Destroyer in its place.


Feb 04, 2019 at 05:48 PM
ckcarr
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · Defying Physics


Sandstone weight is 150 lbs per cubic foot.
So, if that were 7'x7' and a foot thick it would be 7,350 lbs. You can guesstimate the rest.
And that explains Aaron Ralston's problem. A simple 2'x2' boulder




Feb 04, 2019 at 06:37 PM
Mark Metternich
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · p.1 #5 · Defying Physics


01Ryan10 wrote:
That's an awesome looking rock. Photoshop a Star Wars Star Destroyer in its place.



! Thank you, Ryan, for the needed laugh! All the best to you!


ckcarr wrote:
Sandstone weight is 150 lbs per cubic foot.
So, if that were 7'x7' and a foot thick it would be 7,350 lbs. You can guesstimate the rest.
And that explains Aaron Ralston's problem. A simple 2'x2' boulder



Wow, Craig! Holy smokes!

So, let's be conservative here and guestimate it to be 6 feet wide by 5 feet, and maybe 10 inches thick on one side, going to about 4 inches on the other and almost flat at a few edges...

Well, I forgot everything I learned in college (except the art classes - where I was daydreaming about photography). But that would make it one HEAVY rock! Seems to almost defy physics! But as some of us SW wanderers know, there be weird, alien-like happenings out there for sure. Even without the moonshine!

Thank you for your astute reply. All the best.



Feb 04, 2019 at 07:00 PM
tsaphoto
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · p.1 #6 · Defying Physics


That sharpening technique is spectacular - when and in what form are you going to enlighten the masses on how you did it?


Feb 04, 2019 at 10:11 PM
Mr.Gale
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #7 · p.1 #7 · Defying Physics


That is one impressive rock formation. You did a nice job capturing it. Next time try laying under it and shooting up. :-)

Mr.G



Feb 05, 2019 at 01:03 AM
guidostow
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · p.1 #8 · Defying Physics


Cool rock, cooler sharpening!


Feb 05, 2019 at 08:54 AM
Bob Altic
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · p.1 #9 · Defying Physics


Super cool shot. Thanks for sharing.....Bob


Feb 05, 2019 at 09:26 AM
gordon l
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · p.1 #10 · Defying Physics


Wonderful find and photo! I really like it.


Feb 05, 2019 at 05:02 PM
Sunny Sra
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #11 · p.1 #11 · Defying Physics


Mark,
I'm digging this one...really cool.



Feb 05, 2019 at 06:25 PM
Dave Dillemuth
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · p.1 #12 · Defying Physics


Cool shot, Mark! Man, that's some crazy rock formation.


Feb 05, 2019 at 07:08 PM
bobby350z
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #13 · p.1 #13 · Defying Physics


Anyways have you tried the new Google super rez or whatever they call it?


Feb 05, 2019 at 10:15 PM
Mark Metternich
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #14 · p.1 #14 · Defying Physics


tsaphoto wrote:
That sharpening technique is spectacular - when and in what form are you going to enlighten the masses on how you did it?


Thank you for asking. And you are looking at a compressed Jpeg for web viewing!

It will be revealed here (with an NDA - nondisclosure required):

THE ULTIMATE FINE ART PRINTMAKING WORKSHOP

I might teach it via private online Skype lessons and it might make my newest tutorial coming out (The Ultimate sharpening Workflow for Fine Art Printing(2)). But I have not yet decided about that yet. This is unique and extremely valuable information. I showed one of the greatest master printmakers in the industry (Robert B Park - Nevada Art Printers - Lumachrome HD) and he said: "This is HUGE!"

I actually spent the last couple days doing more rigorous testing, and nothing comes even close. Not OnOne, Not Genuine Fractiles, Nothing Adobe, not the size up by 10% over and over, not Preserve details, not Lanczos (which I believe to be the best algorithm to preserve real detail without adding proprietary sharpening in the upsizing) not Qimage, and on and on. It just can not be duplicated. Even the newest AI stuff. I'll show a snapshot of a couple inches of my new 8 foot (96 inches) print I am making (from under 30 MP with an inferior lens) for our workshop to show at the workshop. I think some people may think I am lying, but I am going to teach it.



Feb 06, 2019 at 07:51 AM
tsaphoto
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · p.1 #15 · Defying Physics


Mark Metternich wrote:
Thank you for asking. And you are looking at a compressed Jpeg for web viewing!

It will be revealed here (with an NDA - nondisclosure required):

THE ULTIMATE FINE ART PRINTMAKING WORKSHOP

I might teach it via private online Skype lessons and it might make my newest tutorial coming out (The Ultimate sharpening Workflow for Fine Art Printing(2)). But I have not yet decided about that yet. This is unique and extremely valuable information. I showed one of the greatest master printmakers in the industry (Robert B Park - Nevada Art Printers - Lumachrome HD) and he said: "This is HUGE!"
...Show more

I think there are a lot of us that would be interested in it as a tutorial. The workshop sounds amazing too, but real life will probably get in the way of attending.



Feb 06, 2019 at 12:02 PM
Bob Kane
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · p.1 #16 · Defying Physics


Sounds like uprez-stack-and-average in Photoshop, or PhotoAcute. Both will produce similar resolution with the right technique and image. I do it all the time. I easily make 30x20 prints from Mavic Pro (12MP) stacked files. With an ILC I've gone over 40" and could go much larger if I had the room for it.


Feb 10, 2019 at 08:41 PM
Nori
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · p.1 #17 · Defying Physics


Absolutely beautiful Mark, very well captured. The tight composition makes the blue sky work very well for this image.


Feb 11, 2019 at 09:58 AM
Mark Metternich
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #18 · p.1 #18 · Defying Physics


Bob Kane wrote:
Sounds like uprez-stack-and-average in Photoshop, or PhotoAcute. Both will produce similar resolution with the right technique and image. I do it all the time. I easily make 30x20 prints from Mavic Pro (12MP) stacked files. With an ILC I've gone over 40" and could go much larger if I had the room for it.


Hi Bob.

Thank you very much for the suggestions here, I do very much appreciate it.

I test those algorithms too. The second image is a large leap forward from anything previously obtainable and is a comprehensive proprietary technique we have innovated yet not disclosed yet (we will reveal it in The Ultimate Mastering Fine Art Printmaking class in Vegas at the end of March). I can understand how you might think you could produce the second result, but the original files lack of information and lack of quality was more substantial than you might be thinking. Literally, the first (the bad one) image cannot be beat (but can be nearly matched) with the aforementioned approaches. It is best of the best of every algorithm tested (including the ones you have listed) and then taken through every sharpening protocol you can imaging (Deconvolution, 5 or more types of advanced Highpass, Unsharp Mask, Edge Sharpening, Smart Sharpening, 3rd Party Sharpening and one and on...) to ensure each of the upsizes reached their fullest potential. The original File in Photoshop had literally many tens of layers with every upsize method a person can get their hands on (with ideal finished sharpening appropriately applied). It was immediate that this technique was a light year jump ahead of everything. All other top contenders were similar to each other but a gigantic step back!

Each year (throughout the year) I (and some others) go through a full list of interpolation algorithms. Most of these (these are not the brand names...):

All relative Bicubic algorithms, Nearest-neighbor interpolation, Lanczos, Hybrids, Sinc, new Ai Methods, Bilinear, Box
Mipmap, Fourier-transform methods, Deep convolutional, Neural Networks, Edge Guided, DWT based, Threshold-based, Multistep techniques...

And although Ai is making some incredible ground right now (sometimes beating everything in certain areas) it is far too unruly, uncontrollable and inconsistent at this point.

If you want to see this in Vegas, come check it out.





Feb 11, 2019 at 10:20 PM
girvincn
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · p.1 #19 · Defying Physics


Fascinating stuff, Mark. Way over my head, surely, but just from those comparison shots you posted, looks incredible! Keep up the good work!


Feb 16, 2019 at 07:38 AM





FM Forums | Landscape Photographer | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username       Or Reset password



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.