Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
AGeoJO wrote:
Fred, there is no denying that the images from the Batis show more finging. The bokeh on the other hand... I noticed that the Batis images do have more contrast. And as we know, contrastier images render bokeh harsher. I almost would bet if you lower the contrast of the Batis images, the bokeh will be softer. Maybe not the same as but it will be closer to that of the Loxia. Could you give it a try, please?
Plus, the same shutter speed, ISO and virtually the same aperture, f/2.4 and f/2.5 but yet, the Batis images are a tad darker, too... The difference is very noticeable in the sky. Maybe the light transmission between the two lenses is not the same as I don't think an aperture of f/2.4 and f/2.5 won't be enough to create that difference. What do you think?...Show more →
To my eyes, the Loxia actually has higher contrast (at the focused area) and lower contrast at the OOF background. It's a very nice look. All histograms from the crops have been equalized as close as possible. Here is another sample showing the focused area and OOF rendering between the two lenses:

Loxia with better contrast at focused area

Batis with higher contrast at OOF rendering (deeper blacks and more saturated colors). IMO, this is a negative for the Batis.
|