GMPhotography Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
smpetty wrote:
I wish that I could make a case to keep both lenses, but the difference in FOV/AOV is too small to matter to me. The Loxia 25 gaps better with my MF kit (15, 25, 40, 65, 110 (when released)). The only problem is that I also own a razor sharp Batis 25, and duplicating a focal length seems unnecessary. I don't know... I like having separate AF and MF kits, and the more MF photography I return to, the more I like it. But AF is needed in many situations. 24-28 is my favorite focal length range, so I may keep both Zeiss 25's. From the comparative shots that I've taken over the last two days, I'm not sure that I can tell the difference between the lenses.
Would it make more sense to give up the separation of MF and AF kits, swap the Loxia 25 for the 21, and add a unique focal length to my kit? ...Show more →
Your in the same boat as me without a real paddle
I’m light in the AF side sort of . Sony 24-105 and Batis 135 which covers the event stuff but sometimes I get in trouble with low light and the zoom. I can do one of two things maybe three. Lol
Go back to the GM 24-70 or grab the Tammy 28-75 coming out than in low light I pick up that extra stop. Or stick with the 24-105 which I do like it’s sharp than grab a fast wide like maybe even a Sigma 24 1.4 or something . The one lens that floats between both kits is the Batis 135
|