Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
jharter wrote:
I'm sure it has been discussed before, but the 24-105 seems heavy. It weighs more than the 90 macro as a frame of reference. It also weighs about the same as the Batis 25, FE35/2.8, and FE 55/1.8 combined. However, you do get the longer focal lengths and a single filter size.
On the plus side, if it truly performs, it would weigh less than the parts of my travel kit that it would replace: 35, 55, Batis 85 and give me more versatility in focal length. My worry is the optical quality tradeoff? I am less interested in bokeh than sharpness....Show more →
The Sony 24-105/4 G is very light for its range and aperture. It's about 225g lighter than the Sigma and about 150g lighter than the Canon version. I'm very confident it will perform noticeably better than both. Roger will post MTFs comparing these three lenses soon but from what I've seen, I believe it's the sharpest 24-105 ever made.
I get your point though. It covers the range of very light primes like the Batis 25, 35/2.8 and 55/1.8...However, it offers much more FLs than that. It's more like: 24, 28, 35, 50, 85, 100mm in one. 
|