mudlake Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
NeerajnMenon wrote:
Having gone through every page of this thread and the one for the 35GM, I am still torn on which to pick as a 'be all end all lens'.
The size and character of the CV40 is appealing (as is the price), but the autofocus and
overall higher quality of the 35GM's optics sway me that side.
Anyone who has had both, and has traveled with them, can you weigh in with your opinions?
Welcome to FM. 👍
If you want one lens to do it all and you’re choosing between the CV 40 and 35GM, the 35GM is the winner by a large margin. I used to own the CV 40 and no question it’s a great lens. It takes wonderful images.
Now I own the 35GM. The 35GM is sharper, has beautiful bokeh, and most importantly for a “be all, end all” lens - it has autofocus! Which means for portraits you have eye autofocus which is the best thing since sliced bread. 🙂. Taking portraits with an f1.2 manual focus lens is possible, but a pain in the butt for your subject and you. Any slight movement of you or your subject and it’s out of focus. Even stopped down it’s difficult and slow. In contrast, eye autofocus with the 35GM is instant and accurate even at f1.4. ALWAYS.
The CV 40 is a fun lens, but not the one to pick if it’s between it and the 35GM. The 35GM is a beauty. Get it first and then add a used CV 40 later if you want to.
|