Steve Spencer Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.2 #2 · p.2 #2 · FE 35mm f/1.4 arrived - looks well-centered to me. Your thoughts? | |
Jonathan Brady wrote:
Tried to compare the sharpness of the EF 35L II to the FE 35/1.4 just a few minutes ago. Thought I'd put the raw files up in case anyone wants to have a look. I'm honestly not even sure that this is a good test. I felt like it was as the sign is made of wood and the lettering shows a lot of contrast. The issues are the angle of the sign to the camera (perpendicular? no idea, I tried) and that I slightly repositioned the tripod to account for the size of the adapter (I didn't remove the tripod mount from the adapter and therefore couldn't mount the camera directly to the tripod with the Canon lens). Hopefully, it's close enough that some insight can be provided.
I have my own conclusions (again, this was just a sharpness [and contrast, I suppose] comparison) but I'd be interested to read y'alls conclusions, if you're willing to take a look.
Files:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0ZZcKepOp4gbXpZR0VFTU9kbzQ
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0ZZcKepOp4gWGplV0hiSUZ2aUk
35L II is first, 35 ZA is second...Show more →
I think the 35 ZA has more contrast which results in a perception of greater sharpness, but I am not sure what to make of this as I think the black points may be different in the two files. I think the 35L II could be quite a bit better with just a small tweak to exposure, levels, or curves, whatever you like. Both files look really good for this type of shot. That is my take anyway.
|