twomblywhite Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
jaybr wrote:
"Ok completely sincere question: for what reason would you choose this lens if you're going to mostly shoot it at f/2.8? Or were you not aware that it had pretty severe LoCA before purchasing it? From everything I've read about the lens since its announcement it's been understood that to maintain this particular oof rendering a compromise of moderate LoCA would have to be made"
...
Fair question. Answer, stopped down performance. From f2.8, the Voigtlander's straight blades should start giving me the beautiful sun stars they're renowned for. Also from this aperture, LoCa and Vignetting should reduce nicely.
In daylight I rarely shoot at wider apertures than f2.8 (especially portraits), because the DOF is too thin for my liking. If I focus on the eye, at f2.8 the ears and nose are always in focus, which is what I prefer.
In lowlight situations, the Voigtlander FE 40mm's wider apertures gives me more flexibility to take more detailed lower ISO shots when needed.
J...Show more →
Thanks for answering. I'm pretty curious to see the sunstars - I hadn't really been thinking about them when contemplating this lens.
As for the depth of field - I guess it really depends on the subject distance. I personally think that the range of possibilities a wider aperture offers always adds to the potential of a portrait lens (yes, to me it's a wide/normal portrait do-it-all lens if it's good at infinity) of this type. If one needs more dof, contrast, sharpness and fewer aberrations then they just stop down a bit. But you can't make a slower lens faster and f/1.2 offers so very many interesting possibilities.
Also if you shoot at f/1.2 with a 40mm lens and your subject is 7 feet away (84 inches), then the depth of field will be 7.86 inches. That's enough dof for a sharp head from nose to ear.
Also to dismiss f/1.2 and f/1.4 as being too soft is crazy. The rendering at 1.2 in the examples Bastian posted is golden and exactly what I am looking for. And the physical size looks very small - no need to make it more compact. Although the upcoming 35/1.4 is quite a bit smaller yet.
|