freaklikeme Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
My answer to the five-year old question is the Canon 300/2.8L and 500/4.5L in either FD or EF mounts (same optics). No coverage issues and they're incredible bargains on the used market. If you're interested in use with extenders, I'd go with the EF versions. Canon's FD 1.4x is decent, not great. Their EF vII and III are superior. The FD 600/4.5 also has no coverage issues, it's relatively light for a manual 600, and, beyond really needing its hood and some minor CA issues, has solid IQ. It forgoes a focus ring in favor of wheels at the base of the tripod foot and that takes some getting used to.
Every Nikon super-tele I've used, including the PF 300 and 500, have some mechanical (hard) vignetting in the extreme corners on the 50sII with a Steelsring adapter. I believe it's a limitation of the narrow F-mount. It doesn't stop me from using my 500/4P because a 7:5 crop, my favored aspect ratio, clears it up and coverage is otherwise uniform across the frame, as it is with the PFs. Plus, I most often shoot it on the GFX with my Kenko 1.4x attached, and that takes care of the problem entirely. So, no, they don't completely cover, but it's easy to work around if you're interested in the little wonders.
|