Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
Pixel Perfect wrote:
I agree about the lack of electrical contacts, what where they thinking at this price point.
Really agonising over this lens. If the coma wide open was as good as @ f/2.8 I’d have no hesitation. I have heard that Rokinon were supposedly going to release the 14 f/2.4 in FE mount, but it’s almost a year since they said that. That would be my first choice for landscape, architecture and astrophotography, but the 15mm is so good in every other way than coma. But I also am looking longingly at the Loxia 21mm. Don’t want to buy 2 lenses at this stage, since my 12-24 will get used the most for landscape photography.
I could get the Rokinon for my Canon, and then decide between the Laowa or the Zeiss for the Sony, I can always use the Rokinon with a metabones. The Rokinon other than being slower is considered even better than the Sigma 14 f/1.8 for coma, but you couldn’t go wrong with either. Sigma though is a monster which is why I’d trade some speed for size and weight of the Rokinon.
Argh too many nice primes for the Sony.
...Show more →
I consider the Laowa 15/2 a f/2.8 lens for astro. However, it can be used wide open with some fixing in post (basically removal of coma which mainly appears on big stars..)
The Loxia 21/2.8 is a marvel and imo, the best wide-angle for the E-mount. It's also great for astro from wide-open. (with a hard stop infinity for stars)
Currently I carry the 12-24/4 for landscapes and Laowa 15/2 + Loxia 21/2.8 for nightscapes. (Ok...I use the Loxia for both. )
It's likely that Sigma and Tokina will release new ultra wides for the E-mount next year, so it looks like the Sony E-mount is about to get saturated with lenses. Many are hoping for a Batis 35 and a Loxia 28 as well.
|