chasdfg Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Thanks all for the replies.
Why am I looking for another body for fear of being robbed? I suppose it's an irrational fear, I've travelled across Europe over the past few years with no issues at all (both personal and camera items). I naturally sling the camera across my body or wrap the strap around my wrist, so i'm unlikely to be a victim of any snatch theft, and I never leave my camera unattended. This thought arose because I was looking into travel insurance in Singapore (I was previously based in London for a few years) and found that most insurers only cover up to $1000 for camera gear. If insurance covered half the cost, I'd bring the M240 and 35lux in a heartbeat. It's just a peace of mind thing. I figured if I can't afford to lose it, I should bring something cheaper.
From what I've shortlisted, the RX1RII is the most expensive (ignore the Leica Q, it wasn't really an option anyway). However I can get one used for $2.5k here so I'd rather bring a tiny, silent, power packed camera with a lens I have a soft spot for, when it's still under the cost of a used 35lux or M240. I'm trying to keep the cost as low as I can, but not compromise on the shooting experience and quality so much. If I can avoid a more expensive purchase I will gladly do so. There are symptoms of GAS in my quest.. Ultimately I am rather picky, but if someone handed me one of the above options and said "go shoot" I'd happily do so. I am clearly spoilt for choice - so either I bite the bullet and just go for one of the many options I have or bring what I already have and just go shoot. I admit some might view this as a frivolous endeavour.
On the suggestions
APS-C sensor compact (GR/Coolpix A/X100 series):
I do have access to a Ricoh GR (not the II) and have used one quite a bit while my M was servicing. It's really light and does really well in good light but I find the lens isn't fast enough and not shooting with a viewfinder is something that bothers me (granted I can buy an optical viewfinder). Same for the Coolpix A and X70. However this brings me to the X100T. I'm sure the X100F is a more capable camera but the prices are rather steep for what it is, given there's the T. Does the T have the same sensor as the GR/X70? I was for the most part satisfied with the GR's sensor but in low light I wished it was a stop better. The X100T does have a faster lens and a viewfinder, which gets around some of the issues I had with the GR. Plus it has manual controls. The XT-1 (XT-2/X-Pro2 are too expensive to me) and 23 1.4 is somewhere in the mix, though if there's a tossup between the A6000 + 24 1.8 Zeiss, I wouldn't know.
FE 35 2.8 and A7 Series cameras:
I've heard lots of good things about the FE 35 2.8. In general, vignetting (and corner sharpness) isn't a big issue to me. My main bugbear? Speed of the lens. I'm a sucker for fast glass and anything above f2 isn't an immediate option, though it's certainly an option and 35mm is definitely more natural for me than 28mm.
Why A7 - it's cheaper and I'm trying to keep the cost of the potentially temporary solution low, though IBIS is certainly useful. A7S because its one camera I've coveted for a long while and it's the same price as the A7II. But why I'm reluctant to buy an A7 series camera as a whole is because I'm more likely to keep it after the trip, and more likely to start buying all sorts of glass (in particular C/Y glass) to play with. The adaptability of glass is an option I'm trying to preclude. The M240's cumbersome EVF has thus far put me off doing so.
Alternative M glass:
My issue with the voigtlaender glass is focus shift. I don't know how prevalent this is over CV glass but I've read numerous reviews and forum posts concerning the 28 f2 (a lens I'd otherwise be seriously considering because of bang-for-buck) and 35 1.4 mentioning it. I'm not so sure of whether the 35 1.7 suffers from focus shift - the pictures it produces look fantastic, the 0.5m MFD is brilliant and it's pretty small (though it does lack a "proper" focus tab). Likewise for ZM lenses, the 28 2.8, 35 f2 biogon and even the 25 2.8 all came to mind (the 35 1.4 is too big). While vignetting and corner sharpness aren't a big deal, purple/magenta corners are a bother. Then we have the issue of coding as a whole, which I have a preference for (though manual coding is an option and is minor in the grand scheme of things). I did consider a 28 elmarit or 35 summicron, but they're not really cheap alternatives per se. I also came across a 28mm 2.8 konica hexanon and a 35mm f2 UC-Hexanon, the latter a lens I've eyed for a while. Nevertheless they aren't really options - the UC's MFD is a put off and it costs too much.
In short:
The budget I'm really comfortable to work with is around $700USD. Basically the price of an X100T, or another used M mount lens (though this would mean I'm still bringing a pricey kit there due to M + alternative lens)
The next bracket is the A7 + 35 f2.8/28 f2 vs A6000 + 24 1.8 vs Fuji XT-1 + 23 1.4 vs X100F
Last bracket being the RX1R2, which is really just an exception to the budget because I regard the lens very highly and the form factor, leaf shutter and sensor just make a killer combo.
Or I just bring what I have. Talk about first world problems.
|