BSPhotog Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
Sener wrote:
Canon M-something and 22mm f2?
I really wish Nikon would build a mirrorless something like this. If they would even just build a pancake lens with AF, I'd be happy with a DX DSLR probably...maybe...
Hadn't thought about the Canon M series, but perhaps I'll have to keep an eye on their used price.
---------------------------------------------
darrellc wrote:
Ricoh GR
I've considered the Ricoh, it might actually be one of the better choices if I can find the right deal on a GR II. Coolpix A is really similarly spec'd as well.
---------------------------------------------
timde wrote:
Olympus PEN (small as RX1), Fuji x100f (faster AF now?) are the only alternatives I know of that might have good AF performance and are not excessively expensive.
The Ricoh GR and Sigma DP2 are about all thats left ... my experience with the GR was that the AF was lacking, and I guess the DP2 is no better.
An iPhone with the Zeiss ExoLens might be the best option ....
I'm not certain that I would gain anything with a PEN series Olympus over my OM-D EM-10 that I have right now, aside from minor cosmetic differences and a small difference in size.
I flirted with the idea of a Sigma Merrill or Quattro DP-1/2/3, but even the favorable reviews make it look almost unusable in most circumstances. That said, I'd probably jump on a Quattro if it was <$400 and embrace the constraints as a creative exercise.
iPhone might be the real solution perhaps, though my iPhone 5c isn't probably up to the task lol.
---------------------------------------------
Peire wrote:
Sigmas : 19/2.8,30/2.8,60/2.8 coupled with any Sony NEX or A series make for a small,lightweight combo with excellent IQ.
I think I prefer the idea of a fixed lens system, largely because it can be designed more efficiently for space savings and it also will keep me from investing in a different lens system.
Then again, with Sony refreshing their APS-C models on a pretty regular basis, there will probably be some deals on gently used late-model bodies.
---------------------------------------------
wolfloid wrote:
The problem with the Sonys above is that that are also fiddly and gadgety, and most lenses, 35/1.8 excepted, are either slow or not very good, or both. Even the 35/1.8 is only an f2.4 equivalent. If you want 35mm field of view, then the 24/1.8, though good is very large.
Fuji has got the X100 series direct dials ergonomics right, but they have a way to go yet for things like BBF and direct flash access, and it is still annoyingly too easy to press the wrong buttons when putting it in and out of a bag. The Sonys are still a way behind on direct dials (although they do have BBF if you want it)....Show more →
Yup, agree on the ergonomics. I'm not ashamed to say that at least some of my enjoyment/appreciation for the X100s came from the way it looks/feels in my hand. It was well made, took the knocks that come from regular use and carrying, and performed
On the whole, the segment of higher performing compact cameras is an interesting one. Thought there are a wide range of contenders, nothing sticks out as the clear "right" choice. :-/
|